Mackerel vs rotisserie chicken: which is healthier?

They are about equally nutrient-dense: mackerel scores 43/100 and rotisserie chicken 40/100, so pick by your goal. Both can be part of a healthy diet; the table below shows where each one is stronger. Source: USDA FoodData Central.

Mackerel

43/100Moderate nutrient density

262 kcal per 100 g. 3 oz cooked: 85 g

Rotisserie chicken

40/100Moderate nutrient density

239 kcal per 100 g. 3 oz, meat and skin: 85 g

Which to pick for your goal

  • Fewer caloriesAbout even262 vs 239 kcal per 100 g
  • More proteinRotisserie chicken24 vs 27 g per 100 g
  • More fiberAbout even0 vs 0 g per 100 g
  • Less sugarAbout even0 vs 0 g per 100 g
  • More potassiumMackerel401 vs 223 mg per 100 g
  • Less saturated fatAbout even4.2 vs 3.8 g per 100 g

Nutrition side by side

Per 100 g and per typical portion. Bold marks the better value for each row.
NutrientMackerel, 100 gRotisserie chicken, 100 gMackerel, 85 gRotisserie chicken, 85 g
Calories262 kcal239 kcal223 kcal203 kcal
Protein24 g27 g20 g23 g
Carbohydrates0 g0 g0 g0 g
Sugars0 g0 g0 g0 g
Fiber0 g0 g0 g0 g
Fat18 g14 g15 g12 g
Saturated fat4.2 g3.8 g3.5 g3.2 g
Vitamin C0.4 mg0 mg0.3 mg0 mg
Vitamin A54 µg48 µg46 µg41 µg
Potassium401 mg223 mg341 mg190 mg
Iron1.6 mg1.3 mg1.3 mg1.1 mg
Calcium15 mg15 mg13 mg13 mg
Magnesium97 mg23 mg82 mg20 mg
Sodium83 mg82 mg71 mg70 mg

Last updated . Scores use the HowHealthyIs Score method.

All about mackerel All about rotisserie chicken Open in compare tool