Fattoush vs spanakopita: which is healthier?

They are about equally nutrient-dense: fattoush scores 62/100 and spanakopita 64/100, so pick by your goal. Both can be part of a healthy diet; the table below shows where each one is stronger. Source: USDA FoodData Central.

Fattoush

62/100High nutrient density

95 kcal per 100 g. 1 side bowl: 200 g

Spanakopita

64/100High nutrient density

241 kcal per 100 g. 1 square: 150 g

Which to pick for your goal

  • Fewer caloriesFattoush95 vs 241 kcal per 100 g
  • More proteinSpanakopita1.8 vs 7.9 g per 100 g
  • More fiberSpanakopita1.4 vs 2.3 g per 100 g
  • Less sugarSpanakopita1.7 vs 0.5 g per 100 g
  • More potassiumSpanakopita202 vs 452 mg per 100 g
  • Less saturated fatFattoush0.9 vs 4.5 g per 100 g

Nutrition side by side

Per 100 g and per typical portion. Bold marks the better value for each row.
NutrientFattoush, 100 gSpanakopita, 100 gFattoush, 200 gSpanakopita, 150 g
Calories95 kcal241 kcal190 kcal362 kcal
Protein1.8 g7.9 g3.5 g12 g
Carbohydrates8.9 g20 g18 g30 g
Sugars1.7 g0.5 g3.4 g0.8 g
Fiber1.4 g2.3 g2.9 g3.4 g
Fat6.2 g15 g12 g23 g
Saturated fat0.9 g4.5 g1.7 g6.7 g
Vitamin C12 mg23 mg24 mg34 mg
Vitamin A114 µg362 µg228 µg544 µg
Potassium202 mg452 mg405 mg677 mg
Iron1 mg3.3 mg2 mg5 mg
Calcium32 mg181 mg64 mg272 mg
Magnesium15 mg65 mg29 mg97 mg
Sodium215 mg515 mg430 mg773 mg

Last updated . Scores use the HowHealthyIs Score method.

All about fattoush All about spanakopita Open in compare tool