Early version. Nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central; dietitian review in progress. Not medical advice.

Canned salmon vs pork tenderloin: which is healthier?

They are about equally nutrient-dense: canned salmon scores 52/100 and pork tenderloin 53/100, so pick by your goal. Both can be part of a healthy diet; the table below shows where each one is stronger. Source: USDA FoodData Central.

Canned salmon

52/100Moderate nutrient density

129 kcal per 100 g. 3 oz: 85 g

Pork tenderloin

53/100Moderate nutrient density

143 kcal per 100 g. 3 oz roasted: 85 g

Which to pick for your goal

  • Fewer caloriesAbout even129 vs 143 kcal per 100 g
  • More proteinPork tenderloin20 vs 26 g per 100 g
  • More fiberAbout even0 vs 0 g per 100 g
  • Less sugarAbout even0 vs 0 g per 100 g
  • More potassiumPork tenderloin344 vs 421 mg per 100 g
  • Less saturated fatAbout even0.9 vs 1.2 g per 100 g

Nutrition side by side

Per 100 g and per typical portion. Bold marks the better value for each row.
NutrientCanned salmon, 100 gPork tenderloin, 100 gCanned salmon, 85 gPork tenderloin, 85 g
Calories129 kcal143 kcal110 kcal122 kcal
Protein20 g26 g17 g22 g
Carbohydrates0 g0 g0 g0 g
Sugars0 g0 g0 g0 g
Fiber0 g0 g0 g0 g
Fat5 g3.5 g4.2 g3 g
Saturated fat0.9 g1.2 g0.7 g1 g
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A17 µg0 µg14 µg0 µg
Potassium344 mg421 mg292 mg358 mg
Iron0.6 mg1.1 mg0.5 mg1 mg
Calcium215 mg6 mg183 mg5.1 mg
Magnesium30 mg29 mg26 mg25 mg
Sodium403 mg57 mg343 mg48 mg

Last updated . Scores use the HowHealthyIs Score method.

All about canned salmon All about pork tenderloin Open in compare tool