Buffalo wings vs California roll: which is healthier?

They are about equally nutrient-dense: buffalo wings scores 16/100 and California roll 16/100, so pick by your goal. Both can be part of a healthy diet; the table below shows where each one is stronger. Source: USDA FoodData Central.

Buffalo wings

16/100Low nutrient density

276 kcal per 100 g. 6 wings: 200 g

California roll

16/100Low nutrient density

150 kcal per 100 g. 1 roll (8 pieces): 220 g

Which to pick for your goal

  • Fewer caloriesCalifornia roll276 vs 150 kcal per 100 g
  • More proteinBuffalo wings19 vs 3.3 g per 100 g
  • More fiberCalifornia roll<0.1 vs 1.1 g per 100 g
  • Less sugarBuffalo wings0.2 vs 2.8 g per 100 g
  • More potassiumBuffalo wings226 vs 121 mg per 100 g
  • Less saturated fatCalifornia roll7.3 vs 0.8 g per 100 g

Nutrition side by side

Per 100 g and per typical portion. Bold marks the better value for each row.
NutrientBuffalo wings, 100 gCalifornia roll, 100 gBuffalo wings, 200 gCalifornia roll, 220 g
Calories276 kcal150 kcal552 kcal330 kcal
Protein19 g3.3 g38 g7.3 g
Carbohydrates0.4 g23 g0.8 g52 g
Sugars0.2 g2.8 g0.3 g6.2 g
Fiber<0.1 g1.1 g0.1 g2.5 g
Fat21 g4.7 g43 g10 g
Saturated fat7.3 g0.8 g15 g1.6 g
Vitamin C9.8 mg2 mg20 mg4.5 mg
Vitamin A55 µg4.8 µg111 µg11 µg
Potassium226 mg121 mg452 mg266 mg
Iron0.6 mg0.5 mg1.2 mg1.2 mg
Calcium15 mg19 mg30 mg42 mg
Magnesium18 mg22 mg37 mg48 mg
Sodium605 mg324 mg1211 mg714 mg

Last updated . Scores use the HowHealthyIs Score method.

All about buffalo wings All about California roll Open in compare tool